Virtually every photographer talks about authentic wedding pictures, and every couple talks about real moments. When everyone's using the same words, it's difficult to sift through who's a good fit and who isn't.
Saying you capture authentic wedding pictures is like an NBA basketball player saying, "Look, I made a basket!" or a mechanic saying "I change oil." It's pretty much the job. Likewise, saying you want authentic moments capture doesn't get you much further than saying you want wedding pictures.
Be careful of empty adjectives like authentic because they mean something different to everyone. What does authentic mean to you?
top of page
What are authentic wedding pictures?
Most brides would say authentic wedding pictures are those caught spontaneously, candidly, without direction. They wouldn't be wrong, but they're not completely correct either.
There are many definitions of the word authentic. The one I think applies best is "that which is true to the original." In other words, is the picture faithful to you? Authentic doesn't mean the picture must be literally original or 100% spontaneous. It just has to be faithful to someone or something.
I prefer faithful rather than authentic because it gives me a lot more leeway as an artist. It means I can create something part real and part fantasy, or total fantasy. A fairy tale that draws from reality without trying to be it. Plus, faithful isn't as overused as authentic. Blah.
Action steps
Go out and ask a photographer what authentic moments mean to them. How do they capture them? How do they value them? If authentic wedding pictures are important to you, see if your photographer is on the same page. Look for pictures that are faithful to your aesthetic, your desired style and how you want to remember your wedding.
How do you make emotionally engaging pictures?
Everyone thinks emotionally engaging pictures only come from spontaneous photojournalism. Well, maybe not everyone.
Most couples who come to me  want a photographer with creative input. They want someone who can offer direction that looks natural, as well as capture candid moments.
If you don't consider yourself the expressive or photogenic type, I'd be a great photographer because I have lots of ideas for gentle prompts or direction. Often I'll create a little game or interaction to generate an expression. I also tend to use light to affect the mood and enhance the story.
Then again, I also do plenty of photojournalism at a wedding. Ceremonies and receptions are generally photojournalistic coverage regardless of photographer. I'm always looking for moments between shots. Plus, I can create emotionally engaging pictures from scratch in any environment or light.
And let's face it. Most photojournalists do plenty of directing and prompting anyway. They just present it with a lot more pretense.
Recent Posts
See AllAs a Wisconsin wedding photographer I believe in showing a good portfolio. But I also suggest a good portfolio isn't enough to hire a...
00
At first DIY sounds like a great way to save time and money on your wedding. But too much wedding DIY can quickly become a trap for your...
00
bottom of page
Comments